Eliot Spizzirri vs Tyler Zink Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Jul at 03:24 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Spizzirri vs T. Zink

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Spizzirri 2 - 0 Zink
They have played 4 sets in total, with Eliot Spizzirri winning 4 and Tyler Zink winning 0. The last match between Eliot Spizzirri and Tyler Zink was at the Granby Challenger, 17-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Eliot Spizzirri getting the victory 6-2 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Spizzirri | 2 |
| Zink | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) Granby Challenger(07-17-25)
(SF) Cleveland Challenger(02-01-25)
E. Spizzirri vs T. Zink H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $546,820 | Career Prize Money | $4,905 |
| 62.50% (120-72) | Career Total W/L | 54.35% (100-84) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 2 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 55.56% (5-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Spizzirri vs T. Zink Match Preview:
- Recently, Spizzirri has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 45.3% of such points compared to Zink's 43.79%.
- Spizzirri also outperformed Zink in returning their opponent's second serves, standing at 48.04% to Zink's 45.81%.
- In saving breakpoints, Zink is marginally more effective, with a save rate of 52.44% versus Spizzirri's 52.07%.
- Zink holds a superior match win percentage in the past year, securing 65.79% as opposed to Spizzirri's 57.14%.
- Both players have similar strengths regarding their best-performing surfaces: Spizzirri excels on Hard, whereas Zink favors I.hard.
- Each player's tournament levels differ; Spizzirri has focused on Challengers/ITF, while Zink has predominantly played in Futures/ITF tournaments.
- They met once before, with Spizzirri winning convincingly at the Cleveland Challenger on I.hard.
- The head-to-head record is notably in Spizzirri's favor, with a win in their sole encounter.
- Spizzirri has faced higher-level opponents on average, with an opponent ranking of 262.87 compared to Zink's 383.42.
- In deciding sets, Zink has a higher win percentage recently, though neither player has faced a deciding set against one another.
- Spizzirri is slightly behind in breakpoint conversion, achieving 30.74% compared to Zink's 32.93%.
Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):
With recent statistics showing a marginal edge for Spizzirri in second serve and return points, they appear to have a slight advantage.
Zink has demonstrated a strong overall win rate over the last year, but Spizzirri has maintained a higher average ranking of opponents.
Their head-to-head record favors Spizzirri, having won their previous meeting convincingly.
Considering these factors, along with Spizzirri's past success on the I.hard surface and in key performance areas, Spizzirri is predicted to be the likely victor in the upcoming match.
Eliot Spizzirri vs Tyler Zink Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Spizzirri vs T. Zink H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 15 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:34:14 | Average Match Time | 1:34:14 |
| 71% (100/140) | 1st Serve % | 61% (82/134) |
| 67% (67/100) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (59/82) |
| 65% (26/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (19/52) |
| 43% (6/14) | Break Pts Won % | 11% (1/9) |
| 42% (56/134) | Return Points Win % | 34% (47/140) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Spizzirri Recent Matches Played
T. Zink Recent Matches Played

E. Spizzirri vs T. Zink Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.50% (120/72) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.35% (100/84) |
| 58.59% (266/188) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.28% (218/199) |
| 52.50% (2327/2105) | Games Win/Loss | 50.91% (2047/1974) |
| 65.25% (77/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.08% (50/46) |
| 50.00% (10/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.41% (31/23) |
| 67.50% (27/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.25% (18/14) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 807 | Aces Total | 819 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 401 | Total Double Faults | 377 |
| 1:44:5 | Average Match Time | 1:34:37 |
| 326.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 410.46 |
| 66% (8845/13419) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6874/11715) |
| 69% (6104/8845) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4849/6874) |
| 51% (2322/4574) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2420/4841) |
| 43% (574/1338) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (420/1096) |
| 40% (5475/13684) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4331/11400) |
| 58.82% (10/7) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 62.11% (59/36) | Challenger W/L | 43.75% (21/27) |
| 70.91% (39/16) | Futures W/L | 59.09% (78/54) |
| 63% (117/185) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (99/183) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (45/74) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (25/53) |
| 64% (42/66) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (31/50) |
| 91% (102/93) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (101/88) |
| 9% (102/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (101/13) |
| 30% (90/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (83/12) |